Rubric for Interview

Criterion	4 A-level qualities (90–100)	3 B-level qualities (80–89)	2 C-level qualities (70–79)	1 or 0 D- or F-level qualities (60–69 or below 60)	Score
Completeness	Addresses all aspects of the assignment	Addresses most aspects of the assignment	Addresses select aspects of the assignment	Addresses few, if any, aspects of the assignment
Preparation	Report demonstrates clear evidence of meticulous preparation by writer; interview was conducted in a sophisticated manner	Report demonstrates evidence of preparation by writer; interview was conducted in an effective manner	Report demonstrates a lack of preparation by writer; interview was conducted in a less than professional manner	Report demonstrates little or no preparation by the writer; report is so vague as to cast doubt on the interview process
Analysis	Report makes many perceptive and enlightening comments concerning resource management	Report makes some valuable comments concerning resource management	Report makes few valuable comments concerning resource management	Report makes no valuable comments concerning resource management or does not address the topic
Connection to course concepts	Report makes outstanding connections between course concepts and the interview	Report makes effective connections between course concepts and the interview	Report attempts to make connections between course concepts and the interview	Report makes no connections between course concepts and the interview
Overall presentation (format, style, and writing mechanics)	Report is well-written and insightful; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; is extremely well-organized	Report is well-written and includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; is well-organized.	Report is carelessly written and gives insufficient detail and relevant information; lacks organization.	Report is poorly written and lacks detail and relevant information; is poorly organized.
Total:

Note: Criteria are evaluated on a 4-3-2-1-0 basis. Total rubric points are converted first to a letter grade and then to a numerical equivalent based on a 0–100 scale: 19–20 = A (93–100); 18 = A– (90–92); 17 = B+ (88–89); 14–16 = B (83–87); 13 = B– (80–82); 12 = C+ (78–79); 9–11 = C (73–77); 8 = C– (70–72); 4–7 = D (60–69); 0–3 = F (below 60).