|
Criterion
|
4
A-level qualities
(90–100)
|
3
B-level qualities
(80–89)
|
2
C-level qualities
(70–79)
|
1 or 0
D- or F-level qualities
(60–69 or below 60)
|
Score
|
|
Purpose
|
Introduces and presents topic effectively and clearly; central argument is readily apparent to the reader
|
Introduces and presents topic adequately; central argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper
|
Introduces and presents topic somewhat effectively; writing has a clear argument but may sometimes digress from it
|
Introduces and presents topic poorly; argument is generally unclear
|
|
|
Development and content
|
Develops topic with effective supportive examples; provides a balanced presentation of relevant information and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic; reader gains insights
|
Develops topic with adequate supportive examples; information displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic; reader gains some insights
|
Does not fully develop topic and lacks proper supportive examples; analysis is basic or general; reader gains few insights
|
Topic is undeveloped or has no supportive examples; analysis is vague or not evident; reader is confused or may be misinformed
|
|
|
Documentation and support
|
Topic is supported effectively with legitimate sources that are clearly attributed
|
Topic is generally supported with legitimate sources; attribution is mainly clear
|
Although attribution is present and many sources seem to be legitimate, some statements are unsubstantiated and the source of some ideas is unclear
|
Attribution is missing, or sources given are poorly chosen
|
|
|
Organization
|
Arranges ideas clearly and logically to support the purpose or argument; ideas flow smoothly and are effectively linked; reader can follow the line of reasoning
|
Arranges ideas adequately to support the purpose or argument; links between ideas are generally clear; reader can follow the line of reasoning for the most part
|
Arranges ideas adequately, in general, although ideas sometimes fail to make sense together; reader remains fairly clear about what writer intends
|
Arranges ideas illogically; ideas frequently fail to make sense together; reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and becomes frustrated or loses interest
|
|
|
Writing mechanics
|
Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness
|
Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors
|
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors
|
Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors
|
|
|
APA format
|
Uses APA format accurately and consistently
|
Uses APA format with minor violations
|
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA format
|
Does not use APA format
|
|
|
Total:
|
|