Criterion
|
4
A-level qualities (90100) |
3
B-level qualities (8089) |
2
C-level qualities (7079) |
1
F-level qualities (below 70) |
Score
|
Completeness |
Complete in all respects; reflects all requirements |
Complete in most respects; reflects most requirements |
Incomplete in many respects; reflects few requirements |
Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements |
|
Understanding |
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
|
Analysis and application |
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all questions |
Presents an effective analysis of all questions |
Presents a superficial analysis of some of the questions |
Presents an incomplete analysis of the questions |
|
| Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the case featured and the concepts studied in the reading |
Makes appropriate connections between the case featured and the strategic concepts studied in the reading |
Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the case featured the and concepts studied in the reading |
Makes little or no connection between the case featured and the strategic concepts studied in the reading |
|
Writing mechanics |
Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized |
Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized |
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization |
Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; poorly organized |
|
Total: |
|