Criterion
|
4
Exceptional |
3
Acceptable |
2
Marginal |
1 or 0
Unacceptable |
Score
|
Introduction
|
You describe the interview event in detail and skillfully introduce the person you interviewed. |
You describe the interview event and introduce the person you interviewed. |
You describe the interview event but say little about the person you interviewed. |
You describe little about the interview event or person you interviewed. |
|
| Summary |
You provide a detailed summary of the interview with a clear indication of the questions asked and answers received. |
You provide a summary of the interview with indication of the questions asked and answers received. |
You provide a cursory summary of the interview with little indication of the questions asked and answers received. |
You provide a perfunctory summary of the interview. |
|
| Conclusion |
You identify at least three main points you learned from the interview and convey a clear sense of what you learned and how you might apply it in the future. |
You identify at least two main points you learned from the interview and convey a sense of what you learned and how you might apply it in the future. |
You convey little sense of what you learned from the interview or how you might apply it in the future. |
You convey little, if any, sense of what you learned from the interview. |
|
| Auditor's report |
You secure a synopsis of the annual audit and report in detail on what the auditor had noted as areas in need of correction by the district and how the district has responded. |
You secure a synopsis of the annual audit and report on what the auditor had noted as areas in need of correction by the district and how the district has reponded. |
You secure a synopsis of the annual audit and allude to what the auditor had noted as areas in need of correction by the district. |
You show little or no evidence of having secured a synopsis of the annual audit. |
|
| Writing mechanics and organization |
Your writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; your report is extremely well-organized.
|
Your writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; your report is well-organized.
|
Your writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; your report lacks organization.
|
Your writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; your report is poorly organized. |
|
Total: |
|