Criterion
|
4
A-level qualities (90100) |
3
B-level qualities (8089) |
2
C-level qualities (7079) |
1 or 0
D- or F-level qualities (6069 or below 60) |
Score
|
Design of school initiative
|
Program is written clearly; includes goals, objectives, activities, materials, expected outcomes, data sources, and criteria. |
A competent administrator would understand the design of this program, but it is missing 12 essential pieces. |
Some elements not explained clearly, more of simply cited articles. |
Brushes over design of the program; this is a summary. |
|
Program assessment
|
Clear assessment plan including strategies, timeline, and person responsible for assessment. |
Assessment plan includes strategies and timeline. |
Assessment plan includes one of: strategies, timeline, person responsible, but not all three components. |
No plan in place for assessment of the program. |
|
PowerPoint Presentation
|
Presentation is well-designed, easy to follow, free of distractors. |
Presentation contains some slides that are very wordy and would be difficult to follow. |
Presentation contains several distractors that make it difficult to follow. |
Presentation is full of distractors such as swooping and zooming; slides are too wordy. |
|
Presentation narrative
|
Demonstrates understanding of the material; presented in a conversational style for the intended parent audience. |
Demonstrates understanding of the material. |
Contains educational jargon that may be confusing or difficult to understand for the intended parent audience. |
Reads/sounds as though the narrator is reading articles to the audience. |
|
Writing mechanics
|
APA format throughout, no misspelled words or grammatical errors. |
APA format, no more than one misspelled word or grammatical error. |
May start to flow as a paper, no more than two misspelled words or grammatical errors. |
Poorly written, doesn’t flow as one paper, misspelled words, grammatical errors. |
|