Sample Scoring Rubric for Portfolio Presentation

Exceeds Standard

 X

 Meets Standard

 X

 Fails to Meet Standard Consistently

 X

 Below Standard

 X
Presents a clear, detailed picture of candidate overall.


Presents an adequate overall picture of the candidate.


Presents a picture of the candidate that is somewhat unclear.


Presents an unclear picture of candidate.


Exceeds in all standards presented.


Presents adequate evidence of competencies in standards presented.


Presents some evidence of competencies in standards presented.


Presents little or no evidence of competencies in standards presented.


Highlights strengths especially effectively.


Highlights strengths.


Highlights only some strengths.


Highlights few strengths.


Is more than adequate in use of allotted time for the presentation.


Adequately uses allotted time for the presentation.


Allotted time for the presentation was frequently not used appropriately.


Very poor use of allotted time for presentation.


Presentation engages and is clearly communicated to the audience.


Presentation is clearly communicated to the audience.


Presentation is not always clearly communicated and is not engaging.


Presentation is often not clear and is never engaging.


There is substantial, quality evidence of reflective engagement.


There is evidence of reflective engagement.


Limited evidence of reflective engagement.


No evidence of reflective engagement.


Overall Score:

Comments:


Scoring Tips: As noted in the Johnson et al. text, an individual may score in varying levels in different categories. An overall score takes these differences into account as well as the relative important of various criteria.

Adapted from Ruth S. Johnson, J. Sabrina Mims-Cox, and Adelaide Doyle-Nichols (2006). Developing portfolios in education: A guide to reflection, inquiry, and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage